New Website!

Check out the new website at DailyUN.org – yup, that’s right, DailyUN is still alive! It’s now a part of TheDiplomacyProject.org – an umbrella organization meant to help improve the effectiveness of international negotiations through broad public engagement. It’s still under development, but should be up and running soon.

As for the new style, it allows us to do some cool new things such as live twitter updates during negotiations, an image stream, and featured content. The design is still subject to change, so thoughts are certainly welcome.

-The DailyUN Team

Hmmm…

cross posted from EarthInBrackets.org

Some of these ministerial statements are pretty impressive! I’m feeling a bit better. The worst of the Umbrella Group (Australia, Canada, Japan, US) had me worried and depressed for a bit, but so many other countries get it and are holding the developed countries accountable.

To see it all go down, check out: copportal1.man.poznan.pl/

They have live streams as well as archived footage. Pretty cool!

But that doesn’t mean everything is fine. Negotiators have always been good at talking the talk. It’s the walking part that seems to perplex countries.

The way I see it, we’re sitting in an oven that is slowly warming. We’re talking a lot about how we’re in an oven, but nobody has figured out how we can get out of the oven. 

And yes. We are all in the oven, not just the small islands and least developed countries. However, they will be the first to feel the full deadly consequences of the warming oven.

Hope.

cross posted from EarthInBrackets.org

Again, the youth continue to give me hope. Our latest campaign – the Survival Campaign – has exceeded our wildest expectations.

Visit 350.org/survival to be a part of it.

Essentially we are asking countries to commit to the principle of safeguarding the survival of all countries and peoples. While not all countries have signed on (the US for example), we have received incredible support from other countries.

We printed out plackards for delegates to have with them at their tables during the ministerial high level segment. Unfortuneatly the UNFCCC doesn’t allow delegates to have unapproved things on their tables and security took some away. Despite this, Uganda and Sweden both placed the sign prominently in front of them during their speeches.

Now we need to make sure countries follow through with action.

I’ll give a larger update on the campaign soon!

UPDATE: There are even more countries with them out than I first thought – totally incredible. Not bad for a campaign that started 48 hours ago! The power of youth is amazing. One the list of those with plackards visible: Iceland, Solomon Islands, Costa Rica, Bahamas, Venezuela, Djibouti, Madagascar, Maldives, Costa Rica, Papua New Guinea, and more! (I haven’t been paying complete attention due to emails and blogging).

Sitting in the final few sessions.

cross posted from EarthInBrackets.org

Well, I’m sitting here in the high level segments of the Poznan climate negotiations.

I have to say, I’m pretty disgusted with many of the developed countries speaking. They are more than happy to say one thing – to talk about how great they are and how much they care – and then block text necessary for the literal survival of entire countries.

Pretty fun process.

As one minister from a small island put it this morning, we are talking about mass murder here. Mass murder of both peoples and cultures.

Again, as another minister put it, we are asking small island states to sign onto a suicide pact the way negotiations are currently proceeding.

I don’t know about you, but I’m going to put everything I have into reshaping the political landscape over the next year so that we leave no island behind in this process. Survival is non-negotiable.

All too literally, small islands are in brackets at these negotiations. Countries are essentially trying to decide if the islands are worth saving at this point. For some countries, such as Australia, Canada, Japan, and the US, Christmas bonuses for multi-millionaires seem to be more important.

Survival is Non-Negotiable

(a piece put together by international youth for the daily youth publication in Poznan, Youth Speak!)

We must safeguard the survival of all countries and peoples.

There is no other way to put it. To do otherwise would be one of the greatest tragedies of all time. Negotiators must quickly raise the level of ambition if we are to meet this necessary goal. To wait any longer is unacceptable.

Young people have laid out a clear challenge: take immediate action to safeguard the survival of all countries and peoples. This is especially important for developed countries who must reduce emissions at least 40% by 2020 compared to 1990, with an overall global goal of reducing CO2-e concentrations below 350ppm. Developed countries must also massively increase financial and technological support for both adaptation and mitigation to help achieve this global goal in an equitable manner.

As negotiators hide behind technicalities and acronyms, youth are making their vision for an equitable climate treaty abundantly clear. We need to make sure Poznan, and the year leading up to Copenhagen, are both successful. We need leadership and a commitment by parties to the survival of all countries and peoples.

Survival for All.

cross posted from EarthInBrackets.org

Alrighty, time for an update from Poznan.

Things are going slow here, which is bad. We have less than a year at this point to get an incredibly strong international climate agreement – that is not a very long time. Especially with the level of ambition many developed countries have. But there is hope!

The youth movement here is absolutely inspirational. That’s the only way to describe it. We are working together, without regard to national boarders, for our common future. We are determined to remove the brackets placed around our planet.

We’ve decided to really push the position of AOSIS – the Alliance of Small Island States. At this point, they are calling for stronger targets than anybody (even the NGOs) and are rallying around the idea, along with youth, that we must leave nobody behind in a climate deal. Especially small islands which will literally disappear if we don’t take incredibly strong action.

We must safeguard the survival of all countries and peoples.

There is no other way to put it. To do otherwise would be one of the greatest tragedies of all time – where the people of the world willingly condemn their brothers and sisters to the depths of the sea because they couldn’t kick the carbon habit.

We have lots to do… so lets do it! We need all of your help. Everybody is an ambassador for Small Islands at this point – we need to do everything we can to protect them. That means telling everybody we know about the issue and doing everything we can in terms of lifestyle, as well as political action, to stop catastrophic climate change.

If we wait any longer, it will be too late.

Low Capacity Issues…

I hate to say it, but DailyUN is going to go on a bit of a break due to low capacity issues. The concept is solid, so it may come back, but at this point it simply isn’t feasible.

Making the UN more accessible and transparent is still an absolute priority – in fact, team members from DailyUN are making a mini-documentary on the topic! 

Check out one of our partner blogs EarthInBrackets.org for updates on the project!

Also, for general updates from Poznan, check out YouthClimate.org

We’ll cross post what we can.

International Youth Guideing Principles

Below are the full positions of international youth at COP14. There are other issues being worked on, but these form a foundation.

Shared Vision
Youth envision a world with a safe and stable climate. In this world, unmitigated pollution of the shared atmosphere is no longer acceptable. Developed countries have paid the full debt of their historical emissions burden on the climate by facilitating and financing necessary adaptation measures in developing countries. Also financed by developed countries, global innovation has been harnessed, and effective renewable and energy efficient technologies have been developed and equitably distributed throughout the world.

Having addressed climate change through a strong global agreement, and free from the added pressure of a more dangerous climate, we are now able to turn our full attention to the world’s other pressing issues including food security, water & sanitation, health care, education and freedom. The lessons that we learned from climate change will allow us to work effectively on these issues.

Emissions Targets
Temperature increase due to global warming must be kept as far below 2°C as possible. In order to minimize the risk of climate catastrophe, we must, at the very least, reduce atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases to 350ppm CO2-e as quickly as possible, and follow that up with increased efforts to return to pre-industrial levels of greenhouse gases. A 450ppm CO2-e target, a key aim of many negotiators at this conference, would give us a less than 50-50 chance of staying below 2°C, which is unacceptably risky.

To achieve our goal of a safe climate future, we believe that:
Global emissions must be reduced by at least 85% by 2050 (compared with 1990 levels), in line with IPCC recommendations for maintaining a safe climate.
Developed nations must actively lead, committing to emissions reductions of at least 40% by 2020, and 95% by 2050. Global emissions must peak and decline by 2012.

Technology Transfer
Poverty is intimately linked with a lack of access to energy and other forms of technology. This means that by financing and supporting sustainable development globally, developed nations have the power to end inequity, and create a world where all have equal opportunities. To this end, developed countries must take leadership in research, development and commercialization of renewable and energy efficient technologies, sufficient to transition global infrastructure to a zero emissions future. These technologies must be equitably distributed throughout the world, facilitating clean, efficient and sustainable development in developing countries. Through capacity building and transfer of intellectual property, developing countries should be empowered with the ability to further expand this development.

Adaptation
The impacts of climate change are disproportionately felt. those that are most vulnerable also have the least capacity to adapt. In line with the common but differentiate responsibilities principle, developed countries need to pay the full debt of their historical contribution to climate change by facilitating and financing necessary adaptation measures in developing countries. Action must be taken to create new and additional funds that are separate from existing development assistance. The current amount of funding available for adaptation measures in developing countries is completely inadequate, being only a fraction of that required.

Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD)
Forests are more than just trees and carbon. It is essential that deforestation and forest degradation are dramatically reduced in developing countries equitably and rapidly. Degradation is any activity that reduces a forest’s carbon carrying capacity and/or harms biodiversity. Additionally, any definition of deforestation and forest degradation should distinguish between native forest ecosystems and agricultural tree crops, noting that the former has a far greater carbon carrying capacity. Developed countries have a responsibility to provide finance and support for developing countries to take immediate action to avoid deforestation, permanently protect, and sustainably manage native forests. Priority must be given to protect ancient, biodiverse, and carbon-rich forests. REDD accounting must accurately reflect the actual carbon carrying capacity of these forests. Accountability, transparency, and good governance must be required of all participating parties. In addition, developing nations have a responsibility to prevent emissions leakage and to engage their society in all levels of decision-making.  The engagement and participation of local and indigenous communities must be guaranteed and are not negotiable.

Moreover, the centrality of secure land rights to the REDD conversation cannot be understated. An equitable and effective REDD regime will ensure the security of the land and property of local and Indigenous peoples. Critically, REDD must be a mechanism for forest protection for the sake of climate stabilization, not a mechanism for profit. By extension, we reject REDD as an offset mechanism for Annex-1 countries.

Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry
Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) accounting and reporting must be mandatory, to ensure that all emissions are accounted for when assessing mitigation progress.

LULUCF accounting must accurately reflect the actual carbon carrying capacity of standing forests. Also in the vein of accuracy, there should be a distinction between native forest ecosystems and agricultural tree crops, noting that the former has a far greater carbon carrying capacity.

In addition, LULUCF accounting must be structured such that there are strong incentives for protecting natural, bio-diverse, pristine ecosystems. Accountability, transparency, and good governance are essential.

Finally, all land use and forestry measures must engage and empower local and indigenous people to sustainably manage their local resources and maximize benefits to ecosystem services and biodiversity.

Global Financial Crisis
The global financial crisis provides a valuable opportunity to reconsider the foundations of our economic structures, and to begin the transition to a sustainable, low emissions future. Substantial investment in renewable and energy efficient infrastructure is urgently required, and its implementation will create green jobs that will last beyond the financial crisis. The global financial crisis does not provide an excuse for inaction on climate change. Action on climate change is urgent, and will remain so for the duration of our lifetimes. 

As youth, our future quality of life depends on the actions of today. We cannot afford any delay.

Youth involvement in COP
Young people offer hope, optimism and vision. International youth delegates are the human face of the United Nations, as we will fully experience the future consequences of the actions of humanity. At every COP, we remind governments that they are bargaining with our future, and that their calls for action on climate change must be sincere.

In order to guarantee a safe climate for generations present and future, governments worldwide must act, and act now. Because future generations will either suffer or benefit from decisions made today, it is crucial that young people are involved in shaping these decisions. As a result, we ask that all government delegations include youth representatives, in order to ensure a tangible youth presence at these, the most important international negotiations of our time.

Thoughts on Poznan – Policy Priorities

Poznan is currently at the half-way mark and things are going slowly. Nothing terrible has happened, but the pace of negotiations is unacceptable. If things proceed this way over the next year, there is no way we will have the agreement we need in Copenhagen.

Anyways, onto the main reason for this post – the international youth policy priorities!

These were developed as the priority policy issues for youth during Poznan, though there are many other issues being followed and worked on.

-Overall goal of strong negotiating mandate out of Poznan to ensure major progress at the interim meetings.
-Emission targets (350ppm CO2e and 40% by 2020)
-Adaptation Finance (Need to vastly increase, and manage equitably)
-REDD (Need to take into account, involve, protect local and indigenous people in decisions, ensure land rights, protect biodiversity)

Poznan 2008: Policy Briefing #2

Covering December 5th (Friday)

AWG-LCA ON SHARED VISION

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   (USA and Japan) resisting the push by (G77+China and AOSIS) for adherence to hard science (IPCC).

Issues Dividing Parties:

·   Whether to include strict reduction targets in the Shared Vision, with Japan opposing to the inclusion of 25-40% reductions mentioned in the Assembly document.

·   Financing – G77+China pushing for inclusion in the Shared Vision for new and additional funding by Annex 1 parties for adaptation and mitigation strategies.

Proposals to move forward:

·   Multi-lateral technology fund proposed by G77+China.

·   Broad Consensus for the inclusion of strict emission targets.

 

AWG-LCA ON RISK MGT

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   (Japan and EU) opposed to the developing world. USA has been absolutely silent.

Issues Dividing Parties:

·   Financing – $10 billion insurance scheme proposed by Munich Climate Insurance Initiative. Where the money is going to come from remains ambiguous.

Proposals to move forward:

·   Multi-window mechanism: Insurance, Compensatory, Risk Management

Developed countries to provide more funding for a global insurance scheme. EU’s current contribution of 560 million Euros to various schemes is definitely short of the $10 billion cost estimated by MCII.

 

AWG-LCA ON FINANCE

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   (USA and Canada), (China and G77/AOSIS/Africa), (EU), (Norway)

Issues dividing parties:

·   G77 and China have proposed funding that takes a proportion of GDP and this was loosely endorsed by AOSIS as the only proposal coming anywhere near what was required, especially for adaptation. Canada talked about private sector involvement, and the USA saying nothing at all concrete. Norway talked about strengthening carbon markets (as per their permit auctioning proposal). EU talking in lofty terms but no specifics.

Proposals to move forward:

·   Two more contact groups with a focus on technology and capacity building, and on ‘financing mechanisms’. South Africa on behalf of Africa called for direct responses to the G77 proposal.

 

AWG-LCA ON ADAPTATION

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   Generally AOSIS/Africa versus everyone else, but very little of substance was said.

Issues dividing parties:

·   Very little solid was said. Most countries calling for immediate adaptation quickly on the basis of vulnerability, with Fiji calling for a vulnerability index, and Japan supporting. Also discussion of risk-management approach etc. No-one is mentioning that lots of islands are likely to be underwater soon.

Proposals to move forward:

Maybe the vulnerability index. Very little can happen without movement on funding.
 
CMP ON REVIEW OF ARTICLE 9

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   (EU and Canada), (Singapore, Brazil, Grenada, India), and (Russia)

Issues dividing parties:

·   Argument over the use of “hot air” in the Kyoto Protocol, referring to excess emission credits coming from countries such as Russia, reducing environmental effectiveness of trading system. Russia rebutted saying they would be happy to re-negotiate the entire CDM.

·   Debate on Article 21.1 in Kyoto; EU and Canada arguing provision requires revision; Singapore, Brazil, Grenada, India believe it sufficient

·   No AOSIS position on Article 9 now

Proposals moving forward:

·   Not much movement, would be good to have a strong AOSIS position on this

 
AWG-KP ON SPILLOVER EFFECTS

Major Blocks of Parties:

·   G77 working together, specifically China, India, and South Africa

Issues being discussed:

·   Whether discussion on spillover effects should take into account both positive and negative

·   Many developing countries don’t want positive effects taken into account while developed countries want to see positive impacts taken into account.

·   Oil-rich countries (Saudi Arabia) want impacts on oil-rich countries taken into account.

·   Also a push by developing countries for those who are most vulnerable to be given priority

Proposals moving forward:

·   Not being negotiated here, list can be as long as parties want

·   Suggestions for a workshop and Draft document as a basis